Claims like “99.5% accurate” may sound like marketing hype, but in the carbon accounting world, accuracy is more than a number. Traditional carbon footprint tools often rely on static emission factors and industry averages that can lead to significant data distortion. In sectors like manufacturing, logistics, or agriculture, variations in process, energy source, and supply chain depth often mean that reported emissions can be off by 10–25%.
These industry-wide error margins don’t just affect internal reporting. As more regions are becoming stricter on carbon footprint using ISO 14067 as standard, carbon accounting can achieve better accuracy and become more convincing.